Christopher Doyon, a.k.a. Commander X, sits atop a hillside in an
undisclosed location in Canada, watching a reporter and photographer make
their way along a narrow path to join him, away from the prying eyes of
law enforcement.
It’s been a few weeks of encrypted emails back and forth, working out the
security protocol to follow for interviewing Doyon, one of the brains
behind Anonymous, now a fugitive from the FBI.Doyon, who readily admits taking part in some of the highest-profile
hacktivist attacks on websites last year — from Tunisia to Orlando, Sony
to PayPal — was arrested in September for a comparatively minor assault on
the county website of Santa Cruz, Calif., where he was living, in
retaliation for the town forcibly removing a homeless encampment on the
courthouse steps.
The “virtual sit-in” lasted half an hour. For that, Doyon is facing 15
years in jail.Or at least he was facing 15 years in jail, until he crossed the border
into Canada in February to avoid prosecution, using what he calls the new
“underground railroad” and a network of safe houses across the country.
Thanks to his indictment, Doyon is one of the few Anonymous members whose
real name is now publicly known.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
But as the leader of the People’s Liberation Front — a hacker group allied
with Anonymous — and the second-most wanted information activist after
WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange, he prefers not to show his face, and instead
dons the ubiquitous Guy Fawkes mask, to wear with his Sunday best: a
sweatshirt with the Anonymous calling card, “We do not forgive … We do not
forget.”Terrorists to some, heroes to others, the jury is still out on Anonymous’s
true nature. Known for its robust defence of Internet freedom – and the
right to remain anonymous — Anonymous came in first place in Time
Magazine’s 2012 online poll on the most influential person in the world.
Fox News, on the other hand, has branded the hackers “domestic
terrorists,” a role Anonymous has been cast to play in the latest Call of
Duty Black Ops II, in which Anonymous appears as the enemy who takes
control of unmanned drones in the not-too-distant future. (That creative
decision may have put Activision, the creator of the video-game series, at
the top of the Anonymous hit list.) For its part, much of what Anonymous
does and says about itself, in the far reaches of the Internet, cannot be
verified. Nor do all Anons agree on who they are as a group, and where
they are going.— — — — —
Q: As strictly an online army of hackers, how powerful is Anonymous?
A: Anonymous is kind of like the big buff kid in school who had really
bad self-esteem then all of a sudden one day he punched someone in the
face and went, “Holy s— I’m really strong!” Scientology (one of
Anonymous’s first targets) was the punch in the face where Anonymous began
to realize how incredibly powerful they are. There’s a really good
argument at this point that we might well be the most powerful
organization on Earth. The entire world right now is run by information.
Our entire world is being controlled and operated by tiny invisible 1s and
0s that are flashing through the air and flashing through the wires around
us. So if that’s what controls our world, ask yourself who controls the 1s
and the 0s? It’s the geeks and computer hackers of the world.Q: What does it mean to be a leader of a leaderless organization?
A: We don’t sit around and elect a president but that doesn’t mean there
aren’t leaders within Anonymous. Naturally Commander X or Barrett Brown or
Peter Fein, whether they have names or are still anonymous, they take a
leadership role and are looked up to. The average Anon is not like me,
working 12 hours a day dedicating their life to this. He’s an IT guy or a
cable installer with a few hours to spare and he wants to be told what to
do. It takes organizers to get things done. Anyone in Anon can be a
spokesperson but my ability to speak is based on how much what I say
squares with the consensus of the collective.
Q: It seems like there’s a war going on between hacktivists or information
activists and law enforcement. (At least 40 alleged members of Anonymous
have been arrested around the world in the last year.) Who do you think is
winning right now? A: I think it’s a stalemate at the moment. I think eventually we’ll win.
I’ve always believed that right will always prevail. But at the moment the
arrests have had a chilling effect on the movement. For a 30-minute online
protest I’m facing 15 years in a penitentiary. For the moment that’s the
only indictment against me but I expect there will be more. And it’s not
just about the potential penalty but it’s the trial itself for which they
delivered a terabyte of discovery. That’s about 150,000 pages for a
30-minute protest. That means my trial will be two years long and during
that time I’m under strict surveillance by the FBI. I can’t access
Twitter, Facebook or IRCs (Internet Relay Chats)– I can’t contact any
known member of Anonymous – who are about 50,000 people around the world.So basically it shuts me down as an activist. Even if I prevail in court,
I’m still shut down for two years. Well, I’m unwilling to do that – and
that’s why I’m Canada. In Syria and Tunisia, Libya, Egypt in Nigeria in
the Ivory Coast, we have saved so many lives I can’t even count –
activists and journalists and bloggers and people who come to us to keep
themselves safe in these extremely hostile environments – and I’m
unwilling to lay that kind of work down.
Q: Now that you’re in Canada for the foreseeable future, do you feel
relatively safe?
A: Yes. We have a lot of contacts in the Canadian government. We were
well prepared when I came here, we have an underground railway, and safe
houses in Canada. We might be wrong, but our understanding is that the
Canadian government is about equally concerned with Anonymous and the
United States. Their approach will be: “Step lively, don’t stay long, and
you’ll be fine.” So we’re in negotiation with several countries in Europe
to try to get a permanent political asylum situation set up for myself as
well as for any other Anons and information activists who might need it. …
It’s too bad Canada will not find the political courage to protect
information activists from America like they did in the ‘60s with the
draft dodgers. That’s the reality of it, but they will probably not
actively seek to track me down.Q: Do you think the general public is not concerned enough with online
surveillance or real-life surveillance?
A: I think the general public is beginning to learn the value of
information. To give an example, for a very long time nobody in the U.S.
or the world was allowed to know the number of civilian casualties in
Afghanistan or Iraq. There were wild guesses and they were all over the
ballpark figures, until a young army private named Bradley Manning had the
courage to steal that information from the U.S. government and release it.
Now we know that despite their smart munitions and all their
high-technology they have somehow managed to accidentally kill 150,000
civilians in two countries. … As these kinds of startling facts come out,
the public will begin to realize the value of the information and they
will realize that the activists are risking everything for that
information to be public.
Q: What do you say to people who believe Anons are just cyber-terrorists? A: Basically I decline the semantic argument. If you want to call me a
terrorist, I have no problem with that. But I would ask you, “Who is it
that’s terrified?” If it’s the bad guys who are terrified, I’m really
super OK with that. If it’s the average person, the people out in the
world we are trying to help who are scared of us, I’d ask them to educate
themselves, to do some research on what it is we do and lose that fear.
We’re fighting for the people, we are fighting, as Occupy likes to say,
for the 99%. It’s the 1% people who are wrecking our planet who should be
quite terrified. If to them we are terrorists, then they probably got that
right.
‘I think eventually we’ll win. I’ve always believed that right will always
prevail’“Information terrorist” – what a funny concept. That you could terrorize
someone with information. But who’s terrorized? Is it the common people
reading the newspaper and learning what their government is doing in their
name? They’re not terrorized – they’re perfectly satisfied with that
situation. It’s the people trying to hide these secrets, who are trying to
hide these crimes. The funny thing is every email database that I’ve ever
been a part of stealing, from Pres. Assad to Stratfor security, every
email database, every single one has had crimes in it. Not one time that
I’ve broken into a corporation or a government, and found their emails and
thought, “Oh my God, these people are perfectly innocent people, I made a
mistake.”
Q: What do you think of the student protests in Quebec? A: Wherever I go, especially in the last two years, I have found
protests. I had no idea this was going on in Canada and the day I arrived
in Montreal I was in a coffee house downtown on the corner of Ste.
Catherine and St. Hubert. And there was a protest right there at that park
across the street. The entire intersection became inflamed, I watched
police absolutely brutalize these kids, spraying can after can of tear
gas, launching off pop-bang grenades, tear gas grenades, and the worse
thing I saw these kids do, one of them threw a snowball, and one of them
threw an orange rubber cone at these cops. I mean these cops are in full
body armour for God’s sake, that’s not violence. But what was done to
these kids was so violent that the coffee shop manager locked us all into
the coffee shop. Locked the doors while all around us, literally in these
glass windows all around us, we watched the kids get beaten down. Wherever
I go whether Oakland, San Francisco, Montreal, everywhere I go I see the
same stuff. I see people rising up demanding justice and these brutal,
paramilitary police departments being used to crush them and sure, I get
involved.
Police officers fire tear gas at student protesters in Montreal, April 20,
2012.
Q: Anonymous started out as online pranksters but has gotten a whole lot
more serious in the last two years. What happened? A: I believe Egypt was really a turning point for us emotionally in
Anonymous. Obviously there was always that sort of prankster edge to us.
But people often ask me, “Why are you so mean nowadays?” It started in
Egypt – when you work for days to set up live video feeds and the first
thing you watch through those feeds is people killing your friends with
machine guns – that becomes personal. And then it’s not just Egypt, it’s
Libya, Tunisia, over and over again these Freedom Ops are really what gave
us a sort of take-no prisoners attitude. We get to know these people. It
may not be the same as you and I sitting here, but when you Skype with
people and spend hours and hours talking with them on IRC (Internet Relay
Chat) and they share their hopes and their dreams with you for their
country, their future, when they tell you how they’re risking their lives
so their children can have a better future in some far-off land, you bond
with those people and they become your friends and family.
Q. What’s next for Anonymous? A: Right now we have access to every classified database in the U.S.
government. It’s a matter of when we leak the contents of those databases,
not if. You know how we got access? We didn’t hack them. The access was
given to us by the people who run the systems. The five-star general (and)
the Secretary of Defence who sit in the cushy plush offices at the top of
the Pentagon don’t run anything anymore. It’s the pimply-faced kid in the
basement who controls the whole game, and Bradley Manning proved that. The
fact he had the 250,000 cables that were released effectively cut the
power of the U.S. State Department in half. The Afghan war diaries and the
Iran war diaries effectively cut the political clout of the U.S.
Department of Defence in half. All because of one guy who had enough balls
to slip a CD in an envelope and mail it to somebody.
Now people are leaking to Anonymous and they’re not coming to us with this
document or that document or a CD, they’re coming to us with keys to the
kingdom, they’re giving us the passwords and usernames to whole secure
databases that we now have free reign over. … The world needs to be
concerned.
Recent attacks by AnonymousMay 9 – Anonymous brought down Russian President Vladimir Putin’s website
and the Kremlin’s website to support the country’s protests against
alleged vote tampering during the March elections.May 9 – Anonymous attacked the UN’s official website, accusing it of
ignoring the plight of Palestinian hunger strikers protesting their
detention without trial in Israel.
April 24 – Anonymous attacked the Greek finance ministry website to
protest its plans to fight tax evasion by tracking citizens’ bank,
telephone and credit card data.April 20 – Anonymous takes down the Formula One website, for holding the
event in Bahrain, and to support local protesters fighting against the
continued government repression of activists and opposition politicians.
April 5 – Anonymous hacks into hundreds of Chinese government websites,
taking down the “Great Firewall of China” and offering tips on how to
bypass government censorship.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/05/12/insider-tells-why-anonymous-might-well-be-the-most-powerful-organization-on-earth/